Benton Foundation
Back Home

Acquisition of T-Mobile USA by AT&T

On March 21, 2011, AT&T Inc. ("AT&T") and Deutsche Telekom AG ("Deutsche Telekom") announced an agreement under which AT&T will acquire T-Mobile USA, Inc. ("T-Mobile USA") from Deutsche Telekom.

On April 8, 2011, AT&T filed its application for an antitrust review of its proposed acquisition of T-Mobile at the Justice Department.

On April 21, 2011, the parties filed applications seeking the Federal Communications Commission’s consent to the transfer of control of the licenses and authorizations held by T-Mobile USA and its wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries from Deutsche Telekom to AT&T (the "Applications"). The FCC is accepting public comment on the proposed deal (WT Docket No. 11-65).

Visualizations

Visualizations of the data we're tracking.

States where Agencies have announced intent to review the transaction.

Click on a state to view Headlines related to that state's review.

0 = no activity, 1 = reviewing, 2 = denied, 3 = approved

List of State Agencies

Percentage of headlines, cataloged by the Benton Foundation, in support of or against the merger.

Supporters | Detractors

This timeline is displaying the amount of comments submitted to the FCC by day since May 1st, 2011. A total of 12,825 comments have been submitted.

List of comments

Nature of the Transaction: 

In its April 21 filing at the Federal Communications Commission, AT&T describes its purchase of T-Mobile:

AT&T will buy all T-Mobile USA stock from Deutsche Telekom for $39 billion. Deutsche Telekom will receive $25-$29.2 billion in stock and the remaining balance in AT&T stock. Deutsche Telekom will receive a 5-8 percent equity ownership interest in AT&T. Deutsche Telekom will get to nominate one director for election to the AT&T board.

The cash portion of the purchase price will be financed with new debt and cash on AT&T’s balance sheet. AT&T will borrow up to $20 billion for the purchase. AT&T assumes no debt from T-Mobile USA or Deutsche Telekom.

AT&T is a US-based provider in the United States of wireless, Wi-Fi, high-speed Internet, local and long distance voice, mobile broadband, and TV services. It also provides worldwide wireless coverage and IP-based business communications services. In 2010, AT&T had 96 million wirrless subscribers -- approximately 31 million smartphone users -- and had $53.5 billion in wireless service revenues.

As AT&T begins to deploy LTE services on its AWS and 700 MHz bands, it must continue to support services on the 850 MHz (cellular) and 1900 MHz (PCS) bands for the tens of millions of its customers using two older standards: 1) the 2G GSM standard, and 2) the UMTS standard, enhanced with different types of High Speed Packet Access (“HSPA” and “HSPA+”) technology, which permit increased download and upload speeds. Significantly, those customers’ handsets, purchased over many years, are designed for particular standards and frequency bands, and they will not work with newer technologies or on other bands.

  • AT&T will need to continue dedicating much of its spectrum to supporting these legacy GSM and UMTS services.
  • AT&T projects that it will need to continue devoting 850 MHz and 1900 MHz spectrum to GSM subscribers well into this decade, given the time it will take for AT&T to expand its UMTS network and migrate its GSM subscribers to UMTS or LTE services.
  • To support UMTS services, AT&T uses one or more 10 MHz “carriers” of 850 MHz or 1900 MHz spectrum, each consisting of paired 5 MHz blocks of spectrum. AT&T will need to deploy more carriers in the near future, even if doing so squeezes its GSM spectrum allocation and compromises GSM service quality.
  • AT&T expects it will need to continue to allocate spectrum to UMTS services for a longer period than AT&T needs to continue allocating spectrum for GSM services

Absent a solution to AT&T's spectrum capacity crunch, AT&T’s customers would face a greater number of blocked and dropped calls as well as less reliable and slower data connections. And in some markets, AT&T’s customers would be left without access to more advanced technologies.

AT&T plans to cover more than 250 million people with LTE service by the end of 2013. But in some markets, AT&T says it lacks the AWS or 700 MHz spectrum it needs to deploy LTE at all, while T-Mobile USA has at least 20 MHz of AWS spectrum. In other markets, AT&T says it average spectrum holding is insufficient to permit deployment of the most spectrally efficient LTE services, whereas the combination of AT&T’s and T-Mobile USA’s spectrum will address the situation.

T-Mobile USA is a national provider of wireless voice, messaging, and data services capable of reaching over 293 million Americans. T-Mobile served 33.73 million customers at the end of the fourth quarter of 2010. T-Mobile's revenues for 2010 were $21.347 billion. The company's spectrum licenses were valued at $15.282 billion in 2010. (see http://www.t-mobile.com)

AT&T says T-Mobile USA faces spectrum constraints of its own, despite its substantial investments in spectrum and network facilities. And T-Mobile USA has “no clear path” to LTE. T-Mobile USA has already dedicated its current spectrum to UMTS/HSPA+ and GSM technologies. As a result, T-Mobile USA “does not have access to the spectrum needed to deploy LTE in an economically and technically sustainable fashion.” Even in areas where T-Mobile USA could try to “refarm” its existing spectrum to make room for LTE, it would face serious competitive disadvantages.

Dates: 

Merger Announced:
Mon, 03/21/2011
Applications Filed:
Thu, 04/21/2011
Petitions To Deny Due:
May 31, 2011
Oppositions Due:
June 10, 2011
Replies Due:
June 20, 2011

Updates

Federal Agencies

  • Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
    Request for Approval
  • Department of Justice
    Request for Approval

State Agencies

Supporters

AFL-CIO
Alliance for Digital Equality
ASPIRA Association, Inc.
Avaya
Rick Boucher (Former Rep)
Brocade
Charles River Ventures
CNC - Formerly Cuban American National Council
Coalition of Organizations for Accessible Technology
Communications Workers of America
Facebook
Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD)
Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce
Gov Jack Markell (D-Delaware)
Hispanic Federation
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Intertribal Agriculture Council
Rep Steve King (R-Iowa)
Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
Labor Council for Latin American Advancement
Rep Tom Latham (R-Iowa)
The Latino Coalition
League of United Latin American Citizens
MANA- A Latina National Organization
Microsoft
Minority Media & Telecommunications Council
National Action Network
National Black Chamber of Commerce
National Black Farmers Association
National Conference of Puerto Rican Women
National Hispanic Council on Aging
National Hispanic Foundation for the Arts
National Hispanic Medical Association
The National Grange
National Puerto Rican Coalition
National Rural Health Association
National Urban League
Norwest Venture Partners
Oracle
Qualcomm
Research in Motion
Sequoia Partners
Ser Jobs for Progress National, Inc.
Songwriters Guild of America
Rep Mike Thompson (D-CA)
US Distance Learning Association
US Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
United States Hispanic Leadership Institute
United States - Mexico Chamber of Commerce
Women Impacting Public Policy
Yahoo

Supporters in the news

Detractors

Benton Foundation
Cellular South
Center for Digital Democracy
Center for Media Justice
Cincinnati Bell Wireless
Clearwire
COMPTEL
Computer & Communications Industry Association
Consumer Watchdog
Consumers Union
Custom Wireless
Rep John Conyers (D-MI)
Dish Network
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Sen Al Franken (D-MN)
Free Press
Future of Music Coalition
Greenlining Institute
Iowa Wireless
Sen Herb Kohl (D-WI)
Leap Wireless
Rep Ed Markey (D-MA)
Media Access Project
MetroPCS
Mobile 500 Alliance (Mobile DTV coalition)
National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates
National Hispanic Media Coalition
National Institute for Latino Policy
New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel
New York State Public Service Commission
Open Technology Initiative of the New America Foundation
Public Knowledge
Rural Cellular Association
Seattle Times
Sprint
Utility Consumers’ Action Network
Vodafone

Detractors in the news

Disclaimer: 

The Benton Foundation has voiced opposition to the merger, but this page is meant to be an educational service, so readers may better track this debate.

Related Headlines

more Syndicate content

FCC Comments

  • Maneesh Pangasa 1 day 3 hours ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 3 days 3 hours ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 5 days 1 hour ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 5 days 6 hours ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 5 days 6 hours ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 1 week 2 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 1 week 3 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 1 week 3 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 1 week 3 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 1 week 4 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 2 weeks 1 day ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 2 weeks 1 day ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 2 weeks 3 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 2 weeks 3 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 2 weeks 3 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 2 weeks 4 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 3 weeks 3 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 4 weeks 22 hours ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 4 weeks 1 day ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 4 weeks 4 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 4 weeks 4 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 4 weeks 4 days ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 5 weeks 1 day ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 5 weeks 1 day ago
  • Maneesh Pangasa 5 weeks 2 days ago